By Sandra Lapointe (auth.)
Read Online or Download Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy: An Introduction PDF
Best phenomenology books
Die Frage der philosophischen Methodenbildung, wie sie bei Edmund Husserl im Rahmen seiner Phänomenologie gestellt und beantwortet wurde, wird in dieser Studie aus einem neuen Blickwinkel betrachtet. Ausgangspunkt der Reflexion ist die Hypothese, dass ein enger Zusammenhang besteht zwischen der Weise, wie die natürliche Erkenntnis in der thematischen Untersuchung charakterisiert wird, und der artwork der Konzeption der philosophischen Erkenntnis und ihrer Methode.
Vorbemerkung Wo in den folgenden Manuskriptbeschreibungen nichts anderes vermerkt ist, handelt es sich immer um in Tinte geschriebene Stenogramme (Gabels berger procedure) auf Blattern vom structure ZI,5 X I7 cm. In den Textkritischen Anmerkungen finden folgende Abkurzungen Ver wendung: Bl. = Blatt; Ein/. = Einfugung (Zusatz, fur den vom Ver/.
This paintings investigates the early encounters of French philosophers and spiritual thinkers with the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl. Following an introductory bankruptcy addressing context and technique, bankruptcy 2 argues that Henri Bergson’s insights into lived period and instinct and Maurice Blondel’s genetic description of motion functioned as crucial precursors to the French reception of phenomenology.
Christine Buci-Glucksmann’s The insanity of imaginative and prescient is likely one of the most influential experiences in phenomenological aesthetics of the baroque. Integrating the paintings of Merleau-Ponty with Lacanian psychoanalysis, Renaissance reports in optics, and twentieth-century arithmetic, the author asserts the materiality of the physique and international in her aesthetic theory.
- The Constitution of Consciousness: A Study in Analytic Phenomenology
- Spinoza contra phenomenology : French rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze
- The Company of Words: Hegel, Language, and Systematic Philosophy
- Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger
- Collected Papers, Vol. III
Additional info for Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy: An Introduction
Both notions are common themes in the literature. Yet, important features of both have been neglected. Consequently, their role in Bolzano’s theory has often been misunderstood with the upshot that crucial aspects of Bolzano’s theory as a whole have been completely overlooked. The concern that is at the core of virtually every discussion of Bolzano’s substitutional method is that the latter does not deliver the kind of results one would reasonably expect when it comes to deﬁning analyticity and consequence and, in particular, that it does not account for the kind of epistemic and metaphysical necessity those notions are assumed to carry with them.
Two species that are subordinated to the same genus differ from one another by virtue of a determinate component, what is traditionally called the “speciﬁc difference”. For instance, the property of having a right angle is what distinguishes right triangles with respect to other species of triangles that fall under the same genus. The property of having a right angle is thus in this case the speciﬁc difference of right triangles. Arnauld and Nicole are assuming (i) and (ii) when they describe the relation between two concepts that are situated at different “levels”.
This is what Bolzano effectively sets out to do in the relevant sections of the Theory of Science. As Bolzano conceives of it, analysis is not and need not be meaning preserving. When Bolzano considers the interplay between sentences and propositions, his aim is to provide what he calls an “interpretation” (Auslegung) of sentences. On Bolzano’s view ‘It is snowing in Kansas City on 24 December 2009 at 22:30’ is the correct interpretation of the sentence ‘It is snowing now’ when uttered in Kansas City on the eve of Christmas 2009 at 22:30.